These legal contracts forbid signatories from disclosing confidential, sensitive or proprietary information.

But did you know that they have also begun to find a place in divorce settlements? The trendsetters were wealthier divorcees who began to see the potential utility of the NDA in helping prevent confidential business data and personal information from leaking out into the public domain.

Who can make an NDA?

NDAs may be proposed by a spouse (or ex-spouse) to prevent disclosure of private or sensitive information arising during the marriage or separation. Examples include:

• Details of extra-marital affairs, addictions, or mental health issues
• Confidential business plans, investments, or relationships that the disclosing party considers commercially sensitive
• Communications or conduct that one party deems potentially reputationally damaging if aired publicly or on social media

Sometimes an NDA is drafted as a separate standalone agreement; at other times it is folded into a wider financial settlement or divorce agreement as a confidentiality clause. In many high-value divorces, parties negotiate not only who gets what financially but also how much can or cannot be said later.

An NDA can be standalone or part of a larger legal framework – so, for example, a divorcing couple intent on an NDA might ask their legal representatives to draft a standalone document, or they may choose to incorporate the agreement into the financial settlement itself.

Non-disclosure agreements can only be used to protect information concerning legitimate business activities: anything illegal is excluded by definition. Because family courts place emphasis on transparency and fairness, the use of NDAs in this context is fraught with complications.

Confidential in the courtroom

But why? As any divorce lawyer will confirm, being casual and careless with the details of your divorce settlement is already frowned upon. Everyone involved in financial settlements has a “duty of confidentiality”, a requirement placed upon them to protect the details of this component of divorce from disclosure. But this duty applies only to the financial settlement, the part normally referred to as “financial remedies” by family lawyers. Any confidential or sensitive information that might come to light outside it will not be protected by this standard duty. This means that an NDA can be an attractive additional tool.

NDAs cost money to draft effectively, and their whole purpose is to conceal information that might lead to financial loss or be generally damaging if it became known. Even though NDAs can apply equally to both parties, restricting disclosure by either, within a family the incentives are clear, and this means there is often an imbalance of power if one spouse is wealthier and they insist the other sign an NDA. But equally, a canny spouse will cotton on to the underlying message of an NDA demand: that they are in possession of valuable information and so have power too.

In any case, the appeal of the non-disclosure agreement is by no means restricted to the wealthy, and we have one thing to thank for that: the ubiquity of social media. Reputations can be significantly damaged by a single post on Twitter, Facebook or Instagram– and that damage may linger for years, even if the subject of the post is not especially noteworthy. A timely NDA can help the vulnerable avoid such risks.

Legal enforceability and limits under family law

One of the key constraints is that in divorce/ancillary relief proceedings, both parties are under a legal duty of “full and frank disclosure” to the court (and to each other) of all relevant financial information, assets, liabilities, and income streams. That duty is foundational for fair financial orders to be made. If an NDA attempted to supplant or limit that duty (for example, by preventing one party from disclosing a certain asset), it would likely be ignored by the court.

If, after a financial order is made, it emerges that one party concealed assets or misled through non-disclosure; the court retains power to revisit or set aside the previous order or impose costs sanctions. Courts have shown willingness to reopen settlements if the non-disclosure was material and would have led to a different outcome.

Thus, an NDA cannot realistically override or displace this core disclosure duty in financial remedy proceedings.

Public interest in openness  and court transparency

Another key constraint is that family courts today embrace a measure of publicity and scrutiny. While not all hearings are in open court, judgments and orders may be published (often anonymised or partially so). In some cases, parties may request that judgments anonymise names or redact certain details, but a blanket prohibition on disclosing any information may conflict with the court’s duty to make its decisions intelligible and accessible.

Additionally, family judges are wary of gagging orders that unduly stifle access to justice, oversight, or accountability. If an NDA attempts to silence a party from providing truthful evidence or giving witness statements in future proceedings, a court may rule it contrary to public policy.

Illegality and unenforceability

An NDA cannot lawfully cover or protect wrongdoing (e.g. concealment of crime, violence, or fraud). If the subject matter of the NDA includes criminal activity, or where a signatory is a victim of abuse, courts may render parts of it void.

In addition, regulators (such as the Solicitors Regulation Authority) have issued warnings about unfair or oppressive confidentiality terms, especially where one party was under pressure or unequal bargaining position. Unjust time limits, too-harsh penalties, or shifting burden of interpretation have been flagged as potentially abusive. Therefore, even where an NDA is agreed, sections of it may be judged void for being beyond legitimate bounds or against public policy.

Nuptial agreements

Pre- and postnuptial agreements have no automatic legal standing in family courts. Judges must be convinced the parties were fully informed and that they make fair provision for both spouses. Despite this, they have been a familiar inclusion in divorce proceedings for years, and they have never been more popular.

However, nuptial agreements should not be confused with NDAs: nuptial agreements attempt to define who will receive which assets (money or property) in the event of a divorce. Nevertheless, it has become increasingly common for NDAs to be incorporated into nuptial agreements, especially amongst divorcing spouses who fear that a heavy-handed nuptial agreement may not cast them in the best light, or who simply wish to ensure the security of sensitive information.

Practical risks and pitfalls in family cases

Power imbalance & coercion

In divorce or separation, especially where one spouse is financially dominant or legally better advised, asking the other to sign an NDA can carry implicit coercion (e.g. “sign this or you lose your settlement”). This raises real risks of undue influence or duress arguments, which may lead a future court to set aside the NDA or find it voidable. The weaker party may have little room to negotiate terms, and may not fully appreciate the legal consequences.

Hidden future liability & enforcement difficulty

A spouse may agree to a confidentiality clause without fully appreciating risks of future change. If circumstances evolve (e.g. need to litigate child welfare matters, or respond to defamation or harassment), a previously agreed NDA might hamper important disclosures or defences. Moreover, enforcement of an NDA can provoke further litigation: if one side breaches, the other may sue for damages or injunctions, but enforcement via court may itself necessitate revealing the very material that is supposed to be secret (thus undermining the purpose).

In large disputes, forensic accountants and disclosure protocols may wrestle with limiting confidentiality while giving parties access to key documents. The party insisting on wide secrecy may find the court demands search, audit or disclosure that exceeds what they had hoped.

Reopening final orders

Even after a divorce is legally final, the discovery of undisclosed assets or misconduct can allow the innocent party to petition to reopen the settlement. The existence of an NDA will not necessarily block that reopening, especially when the non-disclosure was material. The court can ignore a confidentiality clause to protect fairness and integrity of the legal process.

Reputation vs rights to speak

One of the motivations for NDAs is reputational protection. But parties must balance that against the right to speak (particularly to legal advisers, child welfare professionals, or others) in future settings. Too restrictive a clause could stifle necessary disclosures (for example, in separation from a domestic abuse or safeguarding situation). Courts may refuse to enforce an NDA clause that unduly gags a person’s ability to respond to allegations or defend their own interests in future court or statutory proceedings.

Legal perspectives

An NDA may have a legitimate role as a tool for protecting privacy, reputation or commercial interests in a family settlement, but it must be structured and balanced very carefully. In many cases, attempting a “blanket silence” is bound to run into judicial resistance or later litigation, so restraint, precision and fairness are essential.

Legal advice may cost money, but it can pay dividends if you are set on the use of an NDA in your divorce. A good lawyer will work to steer reluctant parties to the dotted line, addressing concerns and offering mutually acceptable compromises. They will be able to ensure the NDA is drafted in a way that will be acceptable to family court judges. A key part of this process is ensuring that both parties receive independent legal advice.

An expert lawyer will also provide guidance on the sensitive issue of enforcement if an NDA is breached. If not handled correctly, any measures taken, such as court action, could lead to further confidential information escaping into the public domain, so caution and careful consideration are essential.

The post Non-disclosure agreements and the family courts appeared first on Major Family Law.

Giving evidence in family court is a significant part of the legal process and can greatly affect the outcome of a case. It allows the judge to assess the credibility of the parties and other witnesses, understand the issues from different perspectives, and make findings of fact when disputes arise. Given the high stakes, it is important for those involved to understand not only what is expected of them but also how to approach giving evidence effectively, honestly, and respectfully.

This guide explores the key aspects of giving evidence in the family court, considering both private and public law cases, practical preparation, courtroom etiquette, and the potential challenges that may arise.

The nature of family proceedings

Family proceedings are typically heard in private, meaning that members of the public and media are not usually permitted to attend. This aims to protect the privacy of the parties, especially children, and to encourage honest and open disclosure.

In family law cases, evidence can be provided through various means:

• Written statements (including witness statements and position statements)
• Documentary evidence (financial documents, school reports, medical records, police reports)
• Oral evidence (given in court under oath or affirmation)

While written evidence forms the backbone of the case, the giving of oral evidence is often crucial when there are disputed facts or allegations, or when the court needs to assess the credibility of individuals.

Understanding the role of evidence and witnesses

In family court proceedings, the evidence presented forms the backbone of judicial decisions, whether concerning child arrangements, domestic abuse injunctions, or financial arrangements. The court requires clarity, relevance, and credibility in the material submitted.

Oral vs. written evidence

• At final hearings, evidence is usually delivered orally by witnesses; at interim hearings or pre-hearing stages, it may be submitted in writing via witness statements.
• Witness statements must comply with Practice Direction 22A, and must be verified by astatement of truth.

Witness statement essentials

• A witness statement sets out what factual events the author witnessed—what was seen, heard, or perceived—and why that matters to the judge’s decision.
• It must be prepared carefully and include a statement of truth; omission of these formalities can result in the court rejecting the evidence.

Preparing your evidence

Timing and procedure

You typically receive notice from the court about when to prepare and submit your witness statement. Missing deadlines can result in your evidence being excluded unless the court allows otherwise. If additional evidence becomes relevant, you can request the court’s permission to submit further statements. This could happen, for example, if a partner breaches an order or an incident takes place that is relevant to the proceedings.

Content & structure

• Your statement should stick to facts—not speculation, opinion, or emotion. Be clear, concise, and chronological.
• If you include documents (e.g., messages, records), they must be clearly labelled, organised, and compliant with court-formatting requirements.

If you are representing yourself, you should follow available guidance: outline facts, specify the orders you seek, and explain why the evidence supports them.

Court directions & alternative evidence methods

Under Part 22 of the Family Procedure Rules, the court may issue directions regarding which issues require evidence, the nature of that evidence, its format, and order of presentation.

The court can exclude evidence it considers unnecessary or prejudicial.

Alternative evidence formats

The Evidence Act 2006 allows for evidence to be given through means such as video recordings, behind screens, or via live links, particularly useful for vulnerable witnesses.

Children as witnesses

Special protections exist for children giving evidence. Measures include allowing them to speak from separate rooms, avoiding direct questioning by allegedly abusive parties, and ensuring communication is age appropriate

Expert evidence

Expert witnesses provide opinion evidence in areas beyond the judge’s experience (e.g., child psychology, medical assessments) and must be qualified and independent. Often, the court will appoint a single joint expert. But if vital evidence requires further scrutiny, additional experts may be instructed.

As of March 2025, proposals are under consultation to ban unregulated experts in child-related family cases, unless exceptional reasons justify it. Experts must belong to regulated bodies (e.g., HCPC) or accredited registers.

Role of the witness or party giving evidence

A calm and collected approach is best when giving evidence in a family court. A witness is there to present their side of the story to the judge and lawyers present, so a case needs to be made clearly and coherently.

In family court, the witnesses may include:

• The parties themselves (e.g., parents in child arrangement disputes or spouses in divorce financial cases)
• Professionals (social workers, Cafcass officers, teachers, doctors, police officers)
• Other lay witnesses (friends, relatives, neighbours)

Regardless of status, anyone giving evidence must be prepared to answer questions from both their own legal representative (examination-in-chief) and the other side (cross-examination). The judge may also ask questions directly.

Preparing to give evidence

Unless you are a very confident public speaker, you may find it helpful to make notes beforehand, to organise your thoughts and ensure you have a clear sense of everything you will need to cover in your evidence. These can be long and detailed or simple bullet points – choose the approach that feels most comfortable to you.

If you are likely to be questioned – or ‘cross-examined’ – by lawyers for the opposing side when you appear in court, it might be sensible to think through the likeliest questions beforehand and consider how you might respond. The best qualified person for this process is a solicitor, so ask yours for guidance if you have one.

Understanding your statement

It is essential that the witness:

• Reviews their statement carefully before the hearing
• Familiarises themselves with key details, dates, and events
• Checks for accuracy and ensures they can explain or clarify points if questioned
• Raises any concerns about errors or omissions with their solicitor or legal adviser beforehand

Considering the evidence bundle

In most family cases, there will be a court bundle containing all relevant documents. Witnesses may be referred to this during their evidence. Being familiar with the contents of the bundle can help avoid surprises and allow the witness to respond accurately to questions.

Preparing emotionally and mentally

Giving evidence in family court can be daunting and emotional, particularly when sensitive topics such as allegations of domestic abuse, neglect, or personal conduct are involved. It is advisable for witnesses to:

• Seek support from their legal representative about what to expect
• Practice answering questions calmly and clearly
• Prepare emotionally by considering coping mechanisms (e.g., breathing techniques, having support available after the hearing)

Don’t worry, you don’t need to be an emotionless robot in the witness box. Judges and lawyers expect a human being, and a tear or catch in the throat is entirely understandable, particularly if you are discussing an emotive topic such as access to your children. But any emotion you may feel should not get in the way of presenting the facts of your case or presenting your evidence coherently and constructively.

Giving evidence in court

You will be called to the witness box (assuming this is a face-to-face hearing, not via video conference). Unless you are giving evidence on your own behalf, you will have been allocated a seat in the waiting room outside. Witnesses are not normally allowed to attend hearings that do not directly concern them. Generally, you will not have to wait too long – and certainly no more than a couple of hours.

The oath or affirmation

Once in the witness box, you will be asked to swear the traditional oath to tell “the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth”. This is an important ritual that conveys the solemnity of the occasion and the importance of honesty. Traditionally, this is done on the Bible, but you can also swear an oath on the holy book of another faith if you prefer. In addition, people who do not practice any religion can now simply “affirm” that their evidence will be truthful. Lying in court is a serious offence, and a case of perjury will be dealt with severely.

Examination-in-chief

This is the initial stage where the witness gives their evidence. In most cases, the written statement will stand as the witness’s evidence-in-chief, meaning they will simply confirm that the statement is true and correct. Rarely will the witness be asked to elaborate much at this stage unless there are updates or clarifications.

Cross-examination

Any cross-examination will follow your evidence, with counsel or solicitors for each side taking turns to ask you questions.

Cross-examination is where the other party’s legal representative (or the party themselves, if representing themselves) asks questions. This can be the most challenging part, as the purpose of cross-examination is to test the evidence, challenge inconsistencies, and put forward the other side’s case.

Key points for witnesses during cross-examination:

• Listen carefully to each question before answering
• Take time to consider your response—there is no need to rush
• Answer the question that is asked, directly and honestly
• If you do not know the answer or cannot recall, it is acceptable to say so
• Do not argue with the questioner or become defensive
• Remain calm, polite, and respectful at all times

Questions from the judge

The judge may also ask questions to clarify points or to ensure they have understood the evidence fully. Witnesses should answer these with the same care and honesty.

Re-examination

After cross-examination, the witness’s own representative may have the opportunity to ask follow-up questions. This is limited to clarifying matters arising from cross-examination.

Once the questions have been completed, you will be allowed to leave the witness box. Occasionally, you may be asked to remain on hand for supplementary questions if additional issues have come up.

Courtroom etiquette and practical tips

Addressing the court

When giving evidence:

• Address the judge as “Sir” or “Madam,” or by their title if known (e.g., “Your Honour,” or “Judge”)
• Address legal representatives formally (e.g., “Mr Smith,” “Ms Jones”)
• Avoid making comments directly to the other party or witnesses unless instructed

Presentation and conduct

• Dress appropriately for court (smart but comfortable clothing)
• Switch off mobile phones and devices
• Avoid any interruptions or gestures while others are giving evidence
• Speak clearly and loudly enough to be heard, especially when the hearing is remote or hybrid
• Resist any temptation you may feel to digress. Stick to the topic at hand and get to the point as quickly as you can. Courts are busy, and time is money.
• It’s okay to be nervous. Be honest and say if you are; most lawyers and judges will take this into account.
• If you are cross-examined, do not take such probing personally. No one is on trial in a family court. Testing evidence is an important part of court procedure: it allows judges to establish the facts and reach a fair verdict quickly.

Managing emotions

It is understandable that giving evidence in family court can evoke strong emotions, including anger, sadness, or frustration. However, maintaining composure is important, as the judge will observe demeanour and reactions carefully.

If you feel overwhelmed, it is acceptable to ask for a short break through your representative or the judge directly.

Special considerations and vulnerabilities

The court must assess if a party or witness is vulnerable (e.g., victims of domestic abuse, those with disabilities), and consider making participation directions to support their involvement and the quality of their evidence.

This may include simplifying language, using intermediaries, or providing breaks.

Communication intermediaries

For parties with communication difficulties (e.g., disabilities, learning needs), courts may arrange for a registered intermediary to assist in facilitating understanding and responses.

Support for neurodiverse parties

Advocates are advised to consider reasonable adjustments early on—these may reduce the need for formal intermediaries and support effective engagement.

Special measures

In cases where there are allegations of domestic abuse, or where a witness is particularly vulnerable (e.g., because of mental health issues, learning difficulties, or age), the court may grant special measures, such as:

• Giving evidence from behind a screen
• Using video links
• Having a supporter present (though they cannot coach or assist with answers)

Such measures aim to ensure the witness can give their best evidence without undue distress or fear.

Cross-examination by the alleged abuser

Recent legislative changes (as reflected in the Domestic Abuse Act 2021) prohibit alleged perpetrators of abuse from cross-examining their alleged victims in person. Instead, the court must appoint a qualified legal representative to conduct cross-examination on their behalf, funded by the state if necessary.

Common mistakes to avoid

• Over-preparing scripted answers: Witnesses should avoid rehearsing answers word for word. Over-rehearsed evidence can come across as inauthentic.
• Becoming argumentative: Even if questions feel unfair or provocative, arguing with the questioner may undermine your credibility.
• Exaggeration or omission: Stick to the facts as you know them; exaggeration or conveniently leaving out details can harm your credibility.
• Speculating: Do not guess or speculate; stick to what you directly know or observed.

It is natural to feel nervous, but with good preparation, clear communication, and honest engagement, witnesses can contribute effectively to the judicial process.

Judges in family court understand the emotional complexities of these cases and are trained to listen carefully, assess credibility sensitively, and make decisions in the best interests of children and families.

Ultimately, the goal of giving evidence is to assist the court in finding the truth and making fair, informed decisions. By approaching the process with integrity, honesty, and respect, witnesses can fulfil their role effectively.

The post How to give evidence in the family court: A comprehensive guide for witnesses and parties appeared first on Major Family Law.

 A full disclosure of your financial situation is a vital part of the divorce process in any contested divorce – i.e., one which reaches court because the couple have been unable to agree a settlement between themselves. Without that crucial full disclosure, the courts cannot ensure the couple’s finances and other assets will be divided fairly.

Assets are declared in a standard document referred to as Form E. Each party completes this and doing so correctly is a legal requirement. Figures alone aren’t enough: supporting documents must also be included as evidence. Providing all the details required may take some time, especially if your financial situation is a complex one, so it can be tempting to cut corners or delay the process.

But failing to complete a Form E – or failing to complete one fully – can result in undesirable and expensive complications that will lower your standing with the court and increase the chances of the judge siding with your spouse in the dispute. The court may:

• Issue a court order requiring you to complete the Form E or provide missing documentary evidence or additional information.
• Conclude that you are untrustworthy and allocate an increased share of the assets to your estranged spouse.
• Make cost orders against you – i.e., require you to pay the full costs of a particular action.

In general, the family courts are reluctant to commit individuals to prison, but they will do so if the person’s conduct is considered particularly egregious – and repeatedly failing to comply with court orders will certainly fall into that category in most cases.

Do I need to complete a Form E if my divorce is not contested?

No, there is no legal requirement a Form E if you have reached a settlement after negotiating directly with your estranged husband or wife. However, in some cases, they may ask you complete one anyway and, in most cases, you should agree to this request. If you do not, your ex may well seek a financial settlement in court, with all the additional time expense that will entail – and of course, you will also then be legally obliged to complete a Form E.

What should I declare on my Form E?

Your Form E should be a complete declaration of all your financial situation at that time. You should include:

• Your income in its entirety.
• Your bank accounts.
• The value of your property and assets, along with any expected changes in that value (for example, the potential sale of a company).
• Your investments and insurance policies.
• Your pension entitlements.
• Your debts and liabilities
• Significant future expenditure.

The post I have received a court order saying I could be sent to prison for not providing documents relating to my divorce. Is this true? appeared first on Major Family Law.

This major change will be delivered by the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, which completed its passage through Parliament earlier this month. It is now awaiting the final stage in the creation of new law, royal assent, when it will become an official Act of Parliament.

But whenever royal assent is granted, the Act will not come into force until next year according to Lord Chancellor Robert Buckland. Speaking recently in the House of Commons, he explained that time would be needed for “careful implementation” of the new divorce system.

“At this early stage, we are working towards an indicative timetable of implementation in autumn 2021.”

At that yet-to-be-fixed point, anyone applying for a divorce – the ‘petitioner’ – will no longer need to cite a reason for doing so. Citing one of five facts has been a requirement of divorce petitions for decades. The five facts are:

• Adultery.
• That “the respondent has behaved in such a way that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent” – typically shortened to ‘unreasonable behaviour’ and the most commonly cited fact.
• Desertion for a period of at least two years.
• Having lived apart for a period of at least two years, as long as the other party agrees to the divorce.
• Having lived apart for a period of at least five years, whether or not the other party agrees to the divorce.

All but one of those “facts” (two years separation) require attributing blame to the other spouse, a fact which has been a topic of debate and a source of controversy for a number of years. Campaigners such as family law organisation Resolution insisted that attributing blame for the breakdown of a marriage encourages conflict in an already difficult situation in which children are often on the front line. Resolution works to promote an approach to family disputes which minimise confrontation and the impression that one partner has “won” and the other “lost”, so they naturally gravitated towards the issue of fault-based divorce and campaigned for change. What they sought instead was a ‘no fault’ system in which, as the name suggests, it would no longer be necessary to blame one spouse or the other for the breakdown of the marriage. All you would need to do is declare that the marriage has broken down and could not be salvaged.

The more conservatively minded worried that no fault divorce would encourage people to take marriage less seriously. It has been available in other jurisdictions for some time – including the entirety of the United States, Canada, Australia, Germany and Spain. No fault divorce was introduced on a state-by-state basis in the United States, beginning in California as long ago as 1970.  Tellingly perhaps, Germany used to operate a fault based system based on das Schuldprinzip (‘the principle of guilt’) but this was abandoned in 1976.

The UK is finally ready to join the club. When the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill comes into force anyone applying for divorce will simply no need to declare that the marriage has irretrievably broken down – and that declaration can even be made jointly.

In addition to the significant shift towards no fault divorce, some of the legal terminology used in divorce will changed by the Act. Petitions for a divorce will now be known simply as ‘applications’ and the final two stages in the process will be given the more straightforward names ‘conditional order’ and ‘final order’, with the unnecessary Franco-Latinisms of ‘decree nisi’ and ‘decree absolute’ consigned to history.

In addition, the somewhat antiquated right to ‘defend’ or contest a divorce will also be removed. This right has always been something of an absurdity. How, after all, can you force someone to remain married to a person they no longer love? In fact, it was a rare contested divorce dispute – Owens v Owens, which went all the way to the Supreme Court – that led the government to decide that the time was finally right modernisation and reform.

Resolution naturally welcomed the introduction of the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill, with chair Margaret Heathcote saying it would enable lawyers to better “support couples to resolve matters as constructively and amicablyas possible, minimising the impact on any children they may have”.

Former Resolution chair Nigel Shepherd dubbed it the “…the biggest reform of divorce laws in England and Wales in over 50 years, demonstrating just how outdated and old-fashioned fault-based divorce is.”

The Law Commission is an independent organisation established by the government to regularly review existing legislation and make recommendations for improvement. As long ago as 1990 the commissioners published a report strongly critical of the fault-based system, saying it encouraged conflict and hostility. Recommendations made in this report were incorporated into the Family Law Act 1996, but the section which would have introduced no fault no divorce was never introduced amidst claims that it would be “unworkable”.

And yet here we are, 24 years later. There is a lot happening in the world right now, and autumn 2021 certainly seems a long way off still. But I will be watching the months tick by and preparing carefully for this major change to the biggest sector of family law – and I will be doing so alongside other family lawyers up and down the land.

This monumental step forward in divorce law will make it much easier for you to end your marriage and move forward with your life. If you are reading this because you are considering divorce, then please get in touch to find out where you stand and how you can begin the divorce proceedings. You can speak to our dedicated divorce team by calling 01661 824582 or by emailing enquiries@majorfamilylaw.co.uk. We offer a free 45-minute consultation regardless of background or circumstance.

Photo by Alan Levine via Flickr (Public Domain)

The post No fault divorce on the horizon appeared first on Major Family Law.